Another video seeks to “change the abortion debate”

Before David Daleiden and the Center for Medical Progress, there was Lila Rose with Live Action. Live Action began undercover investigations of Planned Parenthood affiliates in 2007, later releasing video and audio recordings documenting (among other things) some employees facilitating sexual trafficking.

Live Action has just released a new video, featuring a physician who used to perform abortions now explaining what’s involved in a second-trimester abortion. Need I warn you? – the content is disturbing.

In a Facebook post accompanying the release of the video, Live Action says “This video may just change the abortion debate.”

One can only hope. What I expect is that those already committed to the dignity of human life at all stages of development will remain so committed, and that those who defend abortion will continue to use words like “edited videos,” “tragic fetal anomalies,” perhaps even “sensationalism,” with a figurative swipe or two at the doctor.

The late Dr. Bernard Nathanson, a founder of NARAL, became pro-life around the time that I first got involved in the movement. He made a groundbreaking video called The Silent Scream, which may viewed today via YouTube. It showed ultrasound images of a preborn child during an abortion procedure. I was naive enough to think that those images would settle the issue once and for all.

As you and I know, they didn’t. Clump of cells. Not a person. My choice. One recent comment for The Silent Scream on its YouTube page: If they feel pain then drug the little bugger before you scoop him out.

Nathanson, Rose and Daleiden did public service with their work – and I hope Rose and Daleiden keep it up. I’ll share their work where I can. The truth matters.

Yet no matter how intensive the investigation, no matter how many physicians turn away from abortion and tell the truth about what they did, there will always be what Dr. Nathanson called “the averted gaze” – averted from distasteful images, from a sordid industry, from the fact that without the right to life no other right can make sense.

I’m glad Live Action is doing its job. As for changing the debate, I recall seeing The Silent Scream more than thirty years ago. Did it change the debate? Perhaps. End it? No.

“The co-founder of NARAL says stop the killing.”

If you can read only one online post today, click away from mine onto this one: “Terry Beatley fulfills promise to former abortion doctor.”   Beatley is a woman whose pro-life journey has taken her to some interesting places, including a face-to-face meeting with Dr. Bernard Nathanson in 2009. Nathanson co-founded the abortion advocacy group NARAL, but he later became outspokenly pro-life.

Read the whole article. The words that jumped out to me, the ones we ought to share far and wide today, are these.

Toward the end of the in-depth interview, Beatley found herself unexpectedly saying: “If you have a message for America, I will gladly deliver it for you. … I will tell your story, the story of deception but also the story of personal redemption.”

Beatley recalled how Nathanson paused for a moment before replying, “Teach of the strategy of how I deceived America and that the cofounder of NARAL says, ‘Love one another; abortion’s not love. Stop the killing; the world needs more love.’”

This very day, NARALPro-Choice America is sponsoring what it calls #StopTheBans day, in an effort to derail late-term abortion legislation nationwide. Nathanson’s message is a fitting answer.

h/t Jill Stanek for bringing the post about Terry Beatley to my attention. Catholic Herald is a publication of the Diocese of Arlington, Virginia.

Basic Books: Bernard Nathanson’s Story

Aborting America, by Bernard Nathanson, M.D. (Life Cycle Books, 1979): check your local library. Check your church’s bookshelf. Check Amazon. This one is hard to find, but it is worth the search. Nathanson is not just a man who left the abortion industry. He was a doctor who helped create the American abortion industry as we know it today. Later, coming to terms with the facts about the developing child in utero, he stopped doing abortions and started fighting them.

No one else has a story just like his. Nathanson was among the founders of the National Association for the Reform of Abortion Laws, which over the years has morphed into NARAL Pro-Choice America. He worked with like-minded people to change laws against abortion, going so far as to invent statistics about women dying from illegal abortions when the actual statistics weren’t adequate for NARAL’s purposes. He was a physician – an OB/GYN, no less – and when he spoke about the evils of banning abortion, people listened. (That fatal reverence for medical professionals who advocate abortion persists to this day, as I have seen to my sorrow in Concord.) He was involved in 75,000 abortions himself.

An atheist, it was not the religious pro-life arguments that reached him. Technology snuck up on him. Ultrasound images of preborn children forced him to acknowledge the nature of the work he had been doing.

At the time Nathanson wrote, Roe had only been in effect for a few years. His change of mind, when it came, was complete: “Abortion is the most atrocious holocaust in the history of the United States.” He would eventually produce an important short film called The Silent Scream, showing ultrasound images of a preborn child during an abortion. He thought for sure that would bring people around, with its scientific, clinical exposition of what went on during the procedure.

The Silent Scream did not end the debate, of course. Nathanson was undeterred, spending the rest of his days in the pro-life cause. (He died in 2011 at the age of 84.) He produced a second film, Eclipse of Reason, about late-term abortions. He traveled extensively, speaking and writing for as many people as he could reach. That all came after Aborting America, though.

For its historical information alone, this book is vital background information for anyone trying to figure out how abortion politics developed the way they did in the U.S. It’s also an interesting look at a man whose “second act” was just beginning when this book was published.